<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dual Agency is the Designated Hitter of Real Estate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realestatezebra.com/dual-agency-is-the-designated-hitter-of-real-estate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realestatezebra.com/dual-agency-is-the-designated-hitter-of-real-estate</link>
	<description>Your Comprehensive Resource for Creative Insight and Commentary on All Things Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frankly</title>
		<link>http://www.realestatezebra.com/dual-agency-is-the-designated-hitter-of-real-estate/comment-page-1#comment-88480</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatezebra.com/dual-agency-is-the-designated-hitter-of-real-estate#comment-88480</guid>
		<description>In Washington DC Dual Agency is illegal, and I applaud them for that. 

The main reason, at my company, we don&#039;t do Dual Agency, is we aren&#039;t paper pushers. We were hired by one party to represent THEM and only them. If you are a &quot;dual agent&quot; you have to represent both, by representing NONE.

Instead of Dual Agency we do &quot;Unrepresented buyer.&quot; If the buyer doesn&#039;t want a buyer agent, fine, but they have to sign something that they understand that we work for the seller and have to represent the seller&#039;s best interest.

Frank- Broker FranklyRealty.com in Northern Virginia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Washington DC Dual Agency is illegal, and I applaud them for that. </p>
<p>The main reason, at my company, we don&#8217;t do Dual Agency, is we aren&#8217;t paper pushers. We were hired by one party to represent THEM and only them. If you are a &#8220;dual agent&#8221; you have to represent both, by representing NONE.</p>
<p>Instead of Dual Agency we do &#8220;Unrepresented buyer.&#8221; If the buyer doesn&#8217;t want a buyer agent, fine, but they have to sign something that they understand that we work for the seller and have to represent the seller&#8217;s best interest.</p>
<p>Frank- Broker FranklyRealty.com in Northern Virginia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dual Agency Smack-Down: The RE.net smacks back . . . &#124; BloodhoundBlog &#124; The weblog of BloodhoundRealty.com in Phoenix, Arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.realestatezebra.com/dual-agency-is-the-designated-hitter-of-real-estate/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Dual Agency Smack-Down: The RE.net smacks back . . . &#124; BloodhoundBlog &#124; The weblog of BloodhoundRealty.com in Phoenix, Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatezebra.com/dual-agency-is-the-designated-hitter-of-real-estate#comment-173</guid>
		<description>[...] Daniel Rothamel at The Real Estate Zebra explains the industry&#8217;s ambivalence about Dual Agency with a sports metaphor. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daniel Rothamel at The Real Estate Zebra explains the industry&#8217;s ambivalence about Dual Agency with a sports metaphor. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
